Drill and Practice
Roblyer and Doering
(2013) state that drill and practice “allows learners to work problems or
answer questions and get feedback on correctness.” The website above allows students to create
their own flash cards with words and meanings. Flash cards are an easy way for
students to prepare for vocabulary tests mainly. In other language art classes,
such as Spanish, the flashcards can be made to practice translations.
I would personally use this website for vocabulary as
well as reviewing key concepts both in literature and grammar. Many students
can be bogged down by reviewing in this manner; however, flash cards are a
simple review strategy and allow for immediate responses. This could be
converted into a game as well, but for this purpose the typical drill and
practice method is the main goal. By constantly reviewing the terms or other
information on the flash cards, students would be able to retain the
information by learning by rote.
Tutorial
While tutorial software may seems to replace teachers in
a way, Roblyer and Doering (2013) state that “self-instructional tutorials
should in no way threaten teachers, since few conceivable situations make a
computer preferable to an expert teacher.” What this website provides is
several different tutorials in both English as a language and also literature.
The website does require a person to sign up to access the tutorials but
signing up is free. If using an online tutorial is not the preference of a
teacher, one could create their own tutorial using Word processor. Word
processor is very versatile and therefore can be used for many different things
and is free to be used in whichever type of instructional approach the teacher
prefers (Roblyer and Doering, 2013).
Again, most teachers may steer clear of computer based
tutorials because it bypasses the teacher. However, the teacher should embrace
them and use them as a spring board. I would personally use these to lead into
a lesson on a particular topic in English. I would also suggest the website to
my students for extra practice outside of the classroom.
Super
Teacher Tools-- http://www.superteachertools.com/index.php#games
Instructional games
While worksheets do have their place
in the classroom, these activities can become tedious to students.
Instructional games should be considered as an alternative to worksheets and
also as a motivational way to educate students in a fun way (Roblyer and
Doering, 2013). Super Teacher Tools offers a variety of games for the classroom
such as Jeopardy and Who Wants to Be a Millionaire.
I
would gravitate towards the use of Jeopardy. This game would allow me to
combine different topics such as grammar, vocabulary, and literature. This
would work well with groups and also would lend itself to offering a reward
such as bonus points.
Research and Reference
Tools
Research and reference tools are basically electronic
encyclopedias, atlas, and similar resources (Roblyer and Doering, 2013). While
there are many ways to go about research, Wikipedia is a good starting point.
It allows users to do a basic search of a topic and provides information on the
topic.
I do not personally advocate Wikipedia because in
practically all of my English classes the teacher has said not to use
Wikipedia. That opinion has changed it seems because I have found teachers and
professors saying to use it as a starting point for research. I would use
Wikipedia as a quick reference for topics in class and show students how to
start research for assignments.
Test
Maker-http://www.easytestmaker.com/
Materials Generator
Because testing is such an integral
part of education, many websites have been established to streamline the
creation of documents for teachers. Test Maker is one example of those types of
cites. The basic aspects of such generators include test creation, revision
procedures, random question generation, question selection, answer key, and test
banking (Roblyer and Doering, 2013).
While these types of generators can be useful, there can
be an element of danger in my opinion. Should a teacher rely too heavily on a
test generator, teachers lose a bit of originality. The trend of material being
online is becoming more and more common. Yet who is to say that students, who
typically have more technological knowledge than some teachers, would not be
able to go to the test generating website and obtain the test before it is
administered? While I will undoubtedly be a part of the technological infused classroom,
it is still important to be wary of the dangers of relying too heavily on tools
like test generators.
Below is another example of a material generator.
#ED527UM M1 http://t.co/XhCKYtGXRU Here is an awesome website to create puzzles for reviewing vocabulary terms.
— Michael (@mfisher8akl) September 4, 2013
I also agree that material generators can be dangerous. Originality can make the material more retain-able for the students in my opinion.
ReplyDeleteWikipedia is in many ways the Catch-22 of Internet research. Yes, it provides access to information, but the verification of said information is suspect. Yet everyone references it anyway
ReplyDelete